|

Risk Management Strategies
The corporation is entering new stages of opportunity both
on the home front and internationally. In a timely response,
we are developing an appropriate programme for the
strategy and process of identifying, prioritising and
measuring business risk from a sustainability position. To
further this programme on a formalised basis, our work
focuses on strengthening the underlying systems and
controls that track and measure the risk-to-business
relationship. The objective is to bring a margin of comfort
to stakeholders in the veracity and materiality of the
information provided and reflect enterprise cost and impact.
In this programme’s second year, our four-stage approach
framework continues to dictate process. However, with
external influences and the integration into the EWRM,
some priorities and related indicators have changed.
Regardless, the four-stage approach and the processes of
assessment remain consistent, thus establishing a framework
for measurement of variable future risks.
Our internal sustainability accounting methodology links
sustainable business risks to financial consequence. This
framework was formulated based on MTRC’s prioritised
business risk model and the Corporate Sustainability
Assessment questionnaire developed by the independent
Sustainable Asset Management research group. It is used
principally as a tool to measure and systemise the actual
financial costs in managing identified risks and further
sustainability costs. The framework employs MTRC’s Activity Based Costing system for data comprising staff and departmental operating expenses.
Added to the
input data for the year are non-risk capital costs of HKD136
million, mainly generated through the asset improvement
programme. Excluded, as in 2003, are most capital and
projects works and extension works, which cover the
majority of costs incurred in rail project and property
development activities. While not presenting a 360° view
of the company, this nonetheless enables us to utilise a
common base for year-on-year measurement and analysis
of quantified risk on a passenger-services basis. We
anticipate a three-year process in order to establish trends
and a database from which to draw comparable
conclusions. Preliminary comparison in this second year
indicates a mild increase in overall costs, owing mainly to
increased resources employed for operational safety
improvement and management activities related to the
proposed rail merger.
|